From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Josiah Schwab <jschwab@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Documentation error/bug regarding checkboxes
Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:55:34 -0800
Message-ID: <87ob2bj6k9.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <87fvnnzfji.fsf@gmail.com> <87ppmrjyyf.fsf@gmail.com>
	<CA+VA2KOp8ZF=Gq4oQrpn+NkHfrD1hXLHc98+4DFo0B7xek0FJw@mail.gmail.com>
	<87eh37zdqz.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45992)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jschwab@gmail.com>) id 1WDzaB-0001Ly-4I
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:56:23 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jschwab@gmail.com>) id 1WDza0-0004cL-Ka
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:56:15 -0500
Received: from mail-pd0-x232.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400e:c02::232]:64990)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <jschwab@gmail.com>) id 1WDza0-0004c8-DW
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 11:56:04 -0500
Received: by mail-pd0-f178.google.com with SMTP id fp1so2052726pdb.37
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 13 Feb 2014 08:56:03 -0800 (PST)
In-reply-to: <87eh37zdqz.fsf@gmail.com>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: E Sabof <esabof@gmail.com>
Cc: org-mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>


> Actually I did it like this:
>
> + |foo
> + bar
> + baz
>
> If I do this instead, it works as you've said:
>
> |+ foo
> + bar
> + baz

Ah, yes.  I see now.  I do not know if that's what is intended.  Someone
who knows more about org internals will have to chime in.

Josiah