From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Draft mode
Date: Thu, 08 Oct 2015 16:23:39 +0200
Message-ID: <87oag95thw.fsf@gmx.us>
References: <87io6w9p7y.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87io6vd7vl.fsf@gmx.us>
	<87r3l6jv55.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:37694)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rasmus@gmx.us>) id 1ZkC6i-0006Oh-17
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 10:23:44 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rasmus@gmx.us>) id 1ZkC6f-0008Ew-DQ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 10:23:44 -0400
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.21]:49218)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rasmus@gmx.us>) id 1ZkC6f-0008EY-7G
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 08 Oct 2015 10:23:41 -0400
Received: from W530 ([62.80.108.9]) by mail.gmx.com (mrgmx102) with ESMTPSA
	(Nemesis) id 0MQ7sF-1ZfVPj0NJT-005FnH for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>;
	Thu, 08 Oct 2015 16:23:40 +0200
In-Reply-To: <87r3l6jv55.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of
	"Wed, 07 Oct 2015 22:12:06 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hi,

>> Can this just be a variable set by BIND or publish?
>
> It could. If we keep throwing errors on unknown macros, I think we can
> even have an OPTIONS item.

I would be happier with this, I think.

>> The interest of such functionality seems to be limited to people who
>> maintain broken-but-soon-to-be-fixed documents... It does not seem to
>> warrant prime real estate in the exporter IMO. Further, I don't think
>> 'draft' is the correct word for this, but that's of course minor.
>
> I couldn't find anything better. Suggestions welcome.

I agree.  We already have the org-latex-classes, which a very different
from latex-proper classes.  This seems to cause a lot of confusion.
Perhaps we can limit such overlap in the future.

It=E2=80=99s a "relaxed" mode.  I=E2=80=99m not sure what a good term for t=
his is.

Rasmus

--=20
Governments should be afraid of their people