From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric S Fraga <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>
Subject: Re: adding a new org-element?
Date: Tue, 22 Mar 2016 13:59:14 +0000
Message-ID: <87oaa6txzh.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
References: <m2egb3nuuu.fsf@Johns-MacBook-Air.local>
	<87mvpqx6m1.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <m2h9fykap2.fsf@Johns-MacBook-Air.local>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:55711)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1aiMqA-000588-Pa
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 09:59:26 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1aiMq6-0001rI-LP
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 09:59:22 -0400
Received: from mail-db5eur01on0116.outbound.protection.outlook.com
	([104.47.2.116]:58546
	helo=EUR01-DB5-obe.outbound.protection.outlook.com)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <e.fraga@ucl.ac.uk>) id 1aiMq6-0001qc-CG
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 22 Mar 2016 09:59:18 -0400
In-Reply-To: <m2h9fykap2.fsf@Johns-MacBook-Air.local> (John Kitchin's message
	of "Tue, 22 Mar 2016 07:34:49 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: John Kitchin <jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu>
Cc: Emacs orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

On Tuesday, 22 Mar 2016 at 07:34, John Kitchin wrote:

[...]

> the elisp link is a good idea, but I am looking into an idea for a
> chemical markup language where you might have a $(molecule + data)$ and
> reaction descriptions $(molecule -> new molecules)$ that become
> machine-readable as well.

Sounds nice and I would probably find a use for this!  With elisp, you
could of course define functions (reaction ...), (molecule ...),
etc.  Ummmm something to think about for me now that term is finishing
:-)

The nice thing about elisp is having the full power of lisp. even if it
is emacs lisp ;-)

Anyway, keep us posted!

-- 
: Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 25.0.91.1, Org release_8.3.4-626-gb62d55