From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: funny emacs-lisp macro behavior in org-babel related to
 lexical-binding
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2016 18:52:35 +0200
Message-ID: <87oa99ebsc.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <m2y48gavgi.fsf@Johns-MacBook-Air.local>
	<87wpnysikp.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<CAJ51ETqmS5gF-NQuNd1tiLAH6pwEs3CaaFrEv16P0ftA0vRc0A@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46474)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1arTQQ-0005F9-6b
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 12:50:27 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1arTQP-0002IX-9L
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 12:50:26 -0400
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:56261)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1arTQP-0002IQ-3U
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2016 12:50:25 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CAJ51ETqmS5gF-NQuNd1tiLAH6pwEs3CaaFrEv16P0ftA0vRc0A@mail.gmail.com>
	(John Kitchin's message of "Sat, 16 Apr 2016 09:41:45 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: John Kitchin <jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

John Kitchin <jkitchin@andrew.cmu.edu> writes:

> That sounds fine to me. Would you then use
>
> :lexical nil

Sure. However, Babel uses "yes" and "no" as booleans so we also need to
support these. nil and t are fine too, obviously.

You would need to define a new defconst
`org-babel-header-args:emacs-lisp' to specify allowed values
for :lexical.

Also, this should probably be documented somewehere.


Regards,