From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id CGhOI6Ke31/jFAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 18:57:38 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id kM0FH6Ke31+MSwAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 18:57:38 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D8F209403A7 for ; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 18:57:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:46230 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kr3tg-00065p-R0 for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 13:57:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:40470) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kr3sR-0005jg-M6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 13:56:19 -0500 Received: from mail-qt1-x830.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::830]:42943) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kr3sP-0004Z1-Tp; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 13:56:19 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-x830.google.com with SMTP id z3so5241569qtw.9; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 10:56:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version; bh=pAcpD3kFnJBthp6RfVuon4nr210Vcn18xxJ5+sIuRto=; b=gbL+0mh2cii9wc1gsK46MQIeyMXTVsboh1Tax5oTyOGH8YPfcft3mUVvIPv3Uk0kny 2NI8mgWSgEJ3Iut9gSQQwLfaLUqfCAJKC6zVc2o+D/1IzWTZX+enBpBWsFbtTu2KM+sj ye6tSS/+T8s7YwFkiitMdHVUSlwbi9HBmlL7D4q3+IBUtBtOXaeCH+2FuH+DTg4+jpnX o9g0pYLUgkKF42Y4v9cbKB9/2UcknMGZAEofHouaMnc0aCWarI2RTtSLbqnk03TorGBD X3d4XVlgVFzQb5ziNuJC4AQIhaidmkjNrvnXyYCzt8fm7qpUkwlihZwI5t+wiUYATIV1 Znhw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:from:to:cc:subject:references:date :in-reply-to:message-id:user-agent:mime-version; bh=pAcpD3kFnJBthp6RfVuon4nr210Vcn18xxJ5+sIuRto=; b=aMp8VdpDDqcYYGN+OEu+UgmhVXFeiWOBTWLJguo1k+VE3pqnlXKdStwkScBP4D+Fjg jjlAEu7hENGzeYhKLOfkzXDIQzPhwsBMfRs48Lofxb1dlqCQq9M5sIzHf/KYtG9tLPjf n7mBxnVhUYIeXzI6C2PYxsOVcAQNvpyzuIeM6DTDJE5rHqRM8OX4bOGJkX2LOPBCg4bT CvMwCiDJg9LijOGc7tWHdbBxSTGmkJ9YmgDAUxA+GpY0w2TSpLsVAlcXQzAD5kP758bw zPlhadJw+3r0zcLQ1pGY9AMGyxANZxD2axvZJSFWGrSLAn4mooCXZzLLng06qbeT5no1 wO8w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532MuRI/5gpGJ2ftrlGdn0uyzL96llFqaUKaLf4asn6X0LBWydZL 0hqh/L1qWR6NXm20/PsNzTcrxfcHRaE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyHWTXUjG/ETHyRWNspdE41rRNxxuZsbG2DW68pC85AGSuS9Sz+K+eHtG3fr+j1+4Ywkpg2yQ== X-Received: by 2002:ac8:4a19:: with SMTP id x25mr13830004qtq.188.1608490575237; Sun, 20 Dec 2020 10:56:15 -0800 (PST) Received: from gusbrs-laptop ([156.146.43.100]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id z10sm9843625qtm.54.2020.12.20.10.56.13 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sun, 20 Dec 2020 10:56:14 -0800 (PST) From: Gustavo Barros To: Bastien Subject: Re: did behaviour of RET change again? References: <87im8z1cxq.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <874kkgie3e.fsf@gnu.org> Date: Sun, 20 Dec 2020 15:56:12 -0300 In-Reply-To: <874kkgie3e.fsf@gnu.org> (Bastien's message of "Sun, 20 Dec 2020 18:25:57 +0100") Message-ID: <87o8io71df.fsf@gmail.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::830; envelope-from=gusbrs.2016@gmail.com; helo=mail-qt1-x830.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -17 X-Spam_score: -1.8 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Emacs Org mode mailing list , Eric S Fraga Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -0.22 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (headers rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=gbL+0mh2; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: D8F209403A7 X-Spam-Score: -0.22 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: XTZdaFoDhiDW Hi All, On Sun, 20 Dec 2020 at 18:25, Bastien wrote: > > Also, I'm thinking of using headline-data as the new default for the > org-adapt-indentation option. WDYT? > > I know Kevin as a good overview of the whole topic, maybe he can also > advise about what should be done here. I cannot but raise a friendly flag here. I've reported the following behavior I've found for `headline-data' some time ago: https://orgmode.org/list/87r1qukjjs.fsf@gmail.com/ Nicholas Savage did try and could not reproduce. Last time I've tried it, not long ago, I still found the behavior. I would thus suggest that at least some more people try it and check their end before going that route. I'll be happy if it's just me. That said, I do think `headline-data' is a great default value for `org-adapt-indentation', despite the fuss that is bound to ensue for *any* change there. Best regards, Gustavo.