From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: RFC: interactive tag query adjustment Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2007 11:51:57 +0100 Message-ID: <87myshv702.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <20071208182934.GB15129@atlantic.linksys.moosehall> <207B8137-5FC7-4796-8EE1-6D9405D8163E@contrapunctus.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J22ib-0004Ac-MF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 05:52:06 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J22iZ-00048z-Ph for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 05:52:05 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J22iZ-00048i-CK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 05:52:03 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.170]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J22iZ-0005vQ-5U for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 05:52:03 -0500 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so229795ugf.48 for ; Tue, 11 Dec 2007 02:52:01 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <207B8137-5FC7-4796-8EE1-6D9405D8163E@contrapunctus.net> (Christopher League's message of "Sat, 8 Dec 2007 17:45:11 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Christopher League Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Christopher, Christopher League writes: > On Dec 8, 2007, at 1:29 PM, Adam Spiers wrote: >> The idea sounds great! though I copied your code into a buffer, did >> M-x eval-buffer, typed C-c a m and couldn't get any of the "electric" >> keys to behave any differently to normal. Not sure if I did something >> wrong. > > Huh, okay. Maybe the code is rougher than I thought. :) The code is quite okay, it worked for me. I think it's just a matter of having a good interface that could tell you how to add a tag or a to-do keyword. Anyway, I really love the idea and I think this is a promising feature for Org! -- Bastien