From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: org 2 openoffice impress converter Date: Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:50:41 +0000 Message-ID: <87myq3fxzi.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87prv01sty.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <874pcbaciu.fsf@shellarchive.co.uk> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JPeUC-0004f5-8f for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:50:48 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JPeUA-0004dl-Q5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:50:48 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JPeUA-0004de-KA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:50:46 -0500 Received: from ug-out-1314.google.com ([66.249.92.175]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JPeUA-0008Es-Bj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 08:50:46 -0500 Received: by ug-out-1314.google.com with SMTP id a2so1102607ugf.48 for ; Thu, 14 Feb 2008 05:50:45 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <874pcbaciu.fsf@shellarchive.co.uk> (Phil Jackson's message of "Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:33:13 +0000") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Phil Jackson Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Phil, Phil Jackson writes: > Bastien Guerry writes: > >> Of course this rely on the yes-coming-soon! brand new exporter. I >> will work on it this WE, maybe something good will come from this. > > Have you actually started this? If so is there anyway you could share it > with us in a branch? I have some experimental code, but nothing mature enough that would be useful to share. I plan to work on this this we, and I will put a file called `org-export.el' in the git repository sunday night, so you can look at it. > Is that similar to what you (and anyone else interested) was thinking? > Has there already been a discussion about the design? I have plans for a quite detailed implementation, and have been sharing some thoughts with Carsten already. Do you mind if I only give you the details when I can show some code? In any case, I'd glad to work on this with you! Looking forward, -- Bastien