From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Worg: common #+MACRO definitions Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2009 14:52:38 +0800 Message-ID: <87my461geh.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <1254702207.8436.42.camel@beteigeuze> <477C7CE1-81FA-4754-AF26-01A6A3D1D151@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MuhRC-00028E-AD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 02:52:50 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1MuhR7-000282-OG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 02:52:49 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=39428 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MuhR7-00027z-L4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 02:52:45 -0400 Received: from mail-ew0-f208.google.com ([209.85.219.208]:54325) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MuhR6-0001gP-PR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2009 02:52:45 -0400 Received: by ewy4 with SMTP id 4so2426994ewy.31 for ; Sun, 04 Oct 2009 23:52:43 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <477C7CE1-81FA-4754-AF26-01A6A3D1D151@gmail.com> (Carsten Dominik's message of "Mon, 5 Oct 2009 08:01:00 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Carsten Dominik Cc: Orgmode Mailing List Carsten Dominik writes: >> 2.) This is the crucial point: can we have (have we?) >> a common #+SETUPFILE:, where we could define those >> macros? That way we could use those boxes in all >> our files, and they all would look the same, even >> if changed. worg/macros.org ??? > > I would say no problem! Just create it. Bastien, any objections? Sure, no objection! -- Bastien, catching up emails from an airport