From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Org-Mode Homepage error Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2011 17:04:35 +0200 Message-ID: <87mxg1ozgc.fsf@gnu.org> References: <2152B3DFC552DE47A0A36CCC93D735310439FF32@mx01.ecoplan.local> <874o2ai1up.fsf@googlemail.com> <4524.1311625834@alphaville.americas.hpqcorp.net> <87oc0ihwvk.fsf@gnu.org> <80bowhxlpz.fsf@somewhere.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:54848) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QljBE-0001Gc-4u for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:04:29 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QljB7-0002tH-74 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:04:20 -0400 Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:42629) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QljB7-0002t7-06 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 11:04:13 -0400 Received: by wwi14 with SMTP id 14so2281907wwi.0 for ; Tue, 26 Jul 2011 08:04:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <80bowhxlpz.fsf@somewhere.org> (Sebastien Vauban's message of "Tue, 26 Jul 2011 14:36:24 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Sebastien Vauban Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Sébastien, "Sebastien Vauban" writes: > I fear this is above my current capability. I tried to understand that code > for a while, but never succeeded (in a reasonable time) to, and never could > simplify it as I wanted (to use it for my own). Of course, this is mainly due > because of my inexperience in good tools to test and debug JS, and to my lack > of knowledge of that language. > > But, what did you do to fix the problem? Well, I re-published Worg using an older version of org. > The current structure of the HTML page looks good, and follows the > above skeleton (except there is no preamble). So, everything looks > right to me? No. The current HTML structure breaks compatibility with Sebastian's tool. As this is a severe bug, any help on finding a way to fix this is more than welcome... Can you sum up how the div structure changes? What was the structure before and what is it now? I fail to understand why an additional
should break Sebastian's tool. Thanks :) -- Bastien