From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: running the new exporter asynchronously?
Date: Wed, 28 Nov 2012 14:25:16 +0100
Message-ID: <87mwy197wj.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <m238zuw2gh.fsf@top-wifi.irisa.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:52299)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1Tdhhj-00045V-9W
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:29:32 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1Tdhhh-0001JT-8H
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:29:31 -0500
Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:57682)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1Tdhhh-0001JN-1E
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 08:29:29 -0500
Received: by mail-wi0-f177.google.com with SMTP id c10so3868446wiw.12
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Wed, 28 Nov 2012 05:29:28 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <m238zuw2gh.fsf@top-wifi.irisa.fr> (Alan Schmitt's message of
	"Wed, 28 Nov 2012 09:34:22 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Alan Schmitt <alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org> writes:

> Would there be a way for the export process to be asynchronous and not
> lock emacs?

Not yet. 

Actually that's, in my roadmap, the single last feature to implement
before moving the new export engine into core.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou