From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Subject: Re: Highlighting LaTeX fragments
Date: Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:37:36 +0100
Message-ID: <87mwv41d8f.fsf@pank.iue.private>
References: <87vca1towm.fsf@pank.eu> <8738x5s6r1.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87liaxtjf3.fsf@pank.eu> <87a9rdgjtw.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36120)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rasmus@gmx.us>) id 1U6jpg-0007sz-0i
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 10:37:46 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rasmus@gmx.us>) id 1U6jpd-00084b-As
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 10:37:43 -0500
Received: from mout.gmx.net ([212.227.17.20]:61580)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <rasmus@gmx.us>) id 1U6jpd-00084E-1A
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 10:37:41 -0500
Received: from mailout-eu.gmx.com ([10.1.101.210]) by mrigmx.server.lan
	(mrigmx001) with ESMTP (Nemesis) id 0MPsKa-1U1nt23Tuc-0051jj for
	<emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sat, 16 Feb 2013 16:37:38 +0100
In-Reply-To: <87a9rdgjtw.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Sun, 10
	Feb 2013 00:15:39 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: n.goaziou@gmail.com
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org


> Would you mind testing the following patch? I don't like it much because
> it's an all or nothing fontification. I think latex snippets, entities
> and sub/superscript should be separated.

I have no experienced any problems.  I agree that it would be better
not to be able not to fontitfy rouge entities and super/subscripts.

> Anyway, does it replace the missing functionality?

Yes, it seems so replicate the old behavior so far.

=E2=80=93Rasmus

--=20
A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it