From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bastien <bzg@altern.org>
Subject: Re: Support Freemind/Freeplane export
Date: Sun, 03 Mar 2013 19:20:48 +0100
Message-ID: <87mwuk73b3.fsf@bzg.ath.cx>
References: <87r4jxr834.fsf@gmail.com> <87ip59xz4i.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87lia51llv.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87r4jwjs41.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:46038)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1UCDWl-0000Yy-FY
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 13:20:52 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1UCDWj-00045g-Pk
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 13:20:51 -0500
Received: from mail-wg0-x22a.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::22a]:38182)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bastienguerry@gmail.com>) id 1UCDWj-00045X-GG
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 13:20:49 -0500
Received: by mail-wg0-f42.google.com with SMTP id 12so1032004wgh.5
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Sun, 03 Mar 2013 10:20:48 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <87r4jwjs41.fsf@gmail.com> (Jambunathan K.'s message of "Sun, 03
	Mar 2013 23:14:14 +0530")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com>
Cc: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Jambunathan K <kjambunathan@gmail.com> writes:

> In short, the concern you have raised is more cosmetic than
> functional.

I trust you.  The thing is, I have this small incertainty in my
mind on whether there is something functional involved here or not.

Also, IIUC the change is triggered only because ox-freemind.el needs
it, so the little incertainty + why it's needed makes me think twice.

Is it fine to assume that all users want utf8 for their HTML files?

If so, I'm fine with the patch.

I'm just asking confirmation from (other) HTML/coding system experts.
Achim, what do you think?

(The local variable "coding: utf-8" should be "coding: utf-8-emacs"
I think.)

-- 
 Bastien