From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thorsten Jolitz Subject: Re: (org-table-next-row) and # - bug or feature? Date: Fri, 22 Mar 2013 02:36:07 +0100 Message-ID: <87mwtwkygo.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87r4j8kzql.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:48568) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UIqu8-0000Bo-If for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:36:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UIqu6-0001W9-IS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:36:24 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:38705) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UIqu6-0001Vv-CE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Mar 2013 21:36:22 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UIquP-0002P9-0b for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 02:36:41 +0100 Received: from g231234180.adsl.alicedsl.de ([92.231.234.180]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 02:36:41 +0100 Received: from tjolitz by g231234180.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 22 Mar 2013 02:36:41 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Thorsten Jolitz writes: [following up to my own post] > in all 4 following examples point is in cell 1x1 when calling > > ,----------------------- > | M-x org-table-next-row > `----------------------- > > | A | B | > | | | > > | 1 | 2 | > | | | > > | \ | / | > | | | > > but > > | # | b | > | # | | The problem is actually in these two lines of 'org-table-insert-row': ,------------------------------------------------------------- | (if (string-match "^[ \t]*| *[#$] *|" line) | (setq new (replace-match (match-string 0 line) t t new))) `------------------------------------------------------------- looks as if its intentional, but for me this behaviour still seems buggy. -- cheers, Thorsten