From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Date format when exporting to LaTeX? Date: Wed, 03 Jul 2013 10:14:37 +0200 Message-ID: <87mwq45ac2.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <51D1EF34.5080806@bbn.com> <87a9m6j6ls.fsf@pank.eu> <51D2056D.8060704@bbn.com> <87wqp9otcu.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48081) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UuID5-0001Fb-5J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2013 04:14:44 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UuID2-00044y-S6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2013 04:14:43 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-x22b.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::22b]:46062) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UuID2-00044n-LV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 03 Jul 2013 04:14:40 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f43.google.com with SMTP id z11so5359121wgg.34 for ; Wed, 03 Jul 2013 01:14:40 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87wqp9otcu.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Tue, 02 Jul 2013 17:48:49 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Nicolas Goaziou Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Richard Hansen Hi Nicolas and Richard, Nicolas Goaziou writes: >> * org-export-allow-bind-keywords must be true. Adding it as a >> file-local variable is not an acceptable solution in my >> circumstance. >> >> I didn't have to set this variable when I was using 7.8.03 -- >> org-mode simply asked me (once) if it was OK to bind the >> variables. I miss that behavior. > > Unfortunately, re-implementing that behaviour is not trivial. The > internals are just too different. Yes, I remember we tried to re-implement this behavior. Nicolas was kind enough to provide patches per my request, as I think the previous behavior is better. If someone can help in this area, I think this would be nice to fix this "regression". 2 cts, -- Bastien