From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: Problem with org-insert-heading on multi-line items? Date: Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:21:50 -0400 Message-ID: <87mwoujfkx.fsf@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:45993) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V6vGH-0003U5-46 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:22:20 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V6vG9-0004D0-QD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:22:13 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:55342) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1V6vG9-0004Cs-9d for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 00:22:05 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1V6vG6-0003OF-J0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 06:22:02 +0200 Received: from pool-108-7-96-134.bstnma.fios.verizon.net ([108.7.96.134]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 06:22:02 +0200 Received: from ndokos by pool-108-7-96-134.bstnma.fios.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 07 Aug 2013 06:22:02 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Tom Davey writes: > Hello Carsten, > > My apologies for the very tardy reply. You wrote me in June: > >> I believe this issue no longer exists in the current master, >> it was fixed a while ago. Could you please confirm? > > I just upgraded to 8.07, and unfortunately I don't believe it's fixed. > I'm finding the same behavior I described earlier: org-insert-heading > will add a checkbox to a new list item as long as the previous item > extends over two or more lines, even if no checkbox exists in that > previous item. Thanks much and sorry again for the delay in replying. > I can't reproduce this, but given that I could not reproduce Matt Lundin's infinite loop for the longest time (and still cannot consistently) I have to doubt myself: can we have a show of hands? -- Nick