Re: [PATCH] Fixed bug in org-entry-get-with-inheritance

[Bastien <bzg@gnu.org>]

Achim Gratz <Stromeko@nexgo.de> writes:

>> I meant: can you tell me how the tests fail?
>
> They don't produce the result they are supposed to produce.

Thanks for this explanation.

>> I'm interested in the answer.
>
> make BTEST_RE='\\(header-arg-defaults\\|property-accumulation\\)'
> test-dirty

Thanks!

>>>> If the patch is good and the tests are outdated, I'd rather
>>>> fix the tests than revert the patch to re-revert it again.
>>>
>>> No, the patch is bad, otherwise it wouldn't break the tests.
>>
>> Sorry, I don't buy this.
>
> I'm not selling anything.

What I meant is this: broken tests are not a sufficient reason to
revert a commit.  You need to show the commit is wrong and the tests
are not outdated.

In this case, I made the error of reproduce Ilya's solution,
not Ilya's problem, so I wrong assumed his patch was the problem
to his problem.

Ilya: from the maint and master branch, I get "bbb" as a result
for the example you placed in your commit message.  Do you have
"aaa" as a result with Org from maint or master?  If so, can you
provide a recipe?

Thanks,

-- 
 Bastien