From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Eric Abrahamsen Subject: Re: [RFC] Rewrite indentation functions Date: Fri, 02 May 2014 18:01:51 +0800 Message-ID: <87mwf0h52o.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87oazjnf55.fsf@gmail.com> <87d2fwhh95.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> <87fvksoctz.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:36517) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WgAF8-0003wA-1W for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2014 05:59:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WgAF1-0004ZL-Sj for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2014 05:58:57 -0400 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:59994) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WgAF1-0004Z5-Mw for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2014 05:58:51 -0400 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WgAEx-0005qe-S6 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 02 May 2014 11:58:47 +0200 Received: from 222.128.161.142 ([222.128.161.142]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 02 May 2014 11:58:47 +0200 Received: from eric by 222.128.161.142 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 02 May 2014 11:58:47 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > Hello, > > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> Wish I was competent to actually review this, but... In lieu of that, >> I'd be happy to run it and report errors. If you think a separate >> testing branch is warranted, that might be an idea. Otherwise I'd say >> let it drop and we'll pick up the pieces :) > > You can create a local branch in your git repo and apply the patches > I sent (be sure to use the second version of the first patch) there. > > I can certainly wait for your feedback. If it turns out to be mostly > good and no one objects, I will then apply the patches and fix the > remnant issues on master branch. Done! I'll try to give it a little exercise over the next couple of days, though I guess I'm not expecting much breakage.