From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: New worg page: Publishing beamer slideshows and articles from one source Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 14:43:30 +0200 Message-ID: <87mwe4n219.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <3cc8efb7-57ae-4749-9c7e-3c178adb911d@dewdrop-world.net> <20140512191732.GA2281@chitra.no-ip.org> <87zjibuupv.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20140524095416.GD28472@chitra.no-ip.org> <87zji6dv5x.fsf@gmx.us> <87fvjx3yew.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87d2f0u9ah.fsf@gmx.us> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:57056) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WouFe-0005HA-TC for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 May 2014 08:43:43 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WouFZ-0004XR-R2 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 May 2014 08:43:38 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-x230.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c00::230]:33794) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WouFZ-0004XH-KZ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 26 May 2014 08:43:33 -0400 Received: by mail-wg0-f48.google.com with SMTP id k14so3720706wgh.19 for ; Mon, 26 May 2014 05:43:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87d2f0u9ah.fsf@gmx.us> (rasmus@gmx.us's message of "Mon, 26 May 2014 12:24:54 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Rasmus Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Rasmus, Rasmus writes: >> The only tricky part is to remove the heading from the table >> of contents, but this is optional and the limitation can be advertized >> as such. > > Come on, that's not really acceptable for an advice on org-mode.org. It is better than the current situation. > To deal with the tricky part you need an additional filter. Or you > need a filter on the final output and you'd probably need to make some > accounting of what's present and what is not so that you can update > counters and TOCs. That's why I say it's tricky. Let's keep this constructive and move forward -- maybe that was not your intention, but the tone of your first email was a bit harsh. I'm sure Suvayu is open to suggestions on how to improve the filter. -- Bastien