From: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
Subject: Re: org-cite and org-citeproc
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 21:17:34 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87mw2qtk4x.fsf@gmx.us> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87wq1u7clv.fsf@gmail.com
Hi,
Aaron Ecay <aaronecay@gmail.com> writes:
> I went round and round with myself about this, and concluded that we
> ought to keep on working on the org-citeproc approach for now (drop
> citeproc-java). But I do think someone eventually ought to reimplement
> org-citeproc based on citeproc-js, to yield something that can be
> distributed via npm. This will be less fool-proof than java, but better
> than the Haskell experience for many users (such as Rasmus and me – far
> from non-technical people!). You mention zotero as a third option –
> it’s possible, but I think we’d be better served by a tool that focuses
> solely on processing and is not so closely tied with database
> management.
I mostly agree.
IMO a non-binary Haskell solution is a non-starter for an "official"
solution. A binary version is fine: e.g. I'm more or less happy with
git-annex.
I'd prefer java over node-js, but I'm less hostile towards npm.
Could there be an elisp wrapper around citeproc-js? Likely, org devs
would have an easier time maintaining such a beast.
> The first is whether the processor generates the in-text citations (you)
> or whether it’s done in elisp (me). It’s not obvious which is superior.
> The real test will come when more diverse citation types are implemented
> (e.g. full citations in footnotes or numbers which reference a numbered
> bibliography at the end of the document).
IMO externalization is the top priority. After that I think elisp is
superior as org-devs presumably would have an easier time maintaining
this.
>> This complicates things enough that probably custom citation modes
>> [in Latex – AE] should be defined as Lisp functions, rather than via
>> format strings...what do you think?
>
> I’d rather avoid it, since I think org->latex is going to be an important
> usecase for many people. I see us eventually supporting two flavors of
> latex output. The first should aim to generate a full set of biblatex
> commands but with little user customizability. The second will rely on
> just 2 citation commands (paren and non-paren), plus some elisp routines
> for combining them into multicites etc. These two cite commands then can
> be customized by the user.
E.g. Natbib has primitives such as \citeauthor and \citeyear so
arbitrarily complex biblatex citations can always be replicated.
>> Also useful. This might take a while for me to figure out, as Pandoc
>> does not seem to generate this markup when formatting a
>> bibliography...maybe I'll see if they are willing to work on this
>> upstream.
>
> I think we should not rely on pandoc to fix this for us. It makes it
> harder to move away from Haskell if (when) we want to.
+1
> I used up all the time I had today to understanding the code and
> surrounding conceptual issues. However, I will try to integrate your
> changes with my branch sometime in the next few days-week.
Richard: do your FSF papers in order. Or do you plan to get them in
order?
—Rasmus
--
Send from my Emacs
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-04-02 19:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-03-28 18:53 org-cite and org-citeproc Richard Lawrence
2015-03-31 8:16 ` Eric S Fraga
2015-03-31 19:13 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-03-31 19:34 ` Nick Dokos
2015-03-31 20:29 ` Thomas S. Dye
2015-03-31 21:57 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-04-01 0:41 ` Thomas S. Dye
2015-04-01 15:42 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-04-01 19:41 ` Thomas S. Dye
2015-04-02 15:57 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-04-02 16:45 ` Thomas S. Dye
2015-03-31 21:12 ` Eric S Fraga
2015-04-01 7:49 ` Andreas Leha
2015-04-02 14:29 ` Eric S Fraga
2015-04-02 15:11 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-04-02 19:26 ` Andreas Leha
2015-03-31 22:03 ` Rasmus
2015-04-01 14:39 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-04-02 0:08 ` Rasmus
2015-04-02 15:26 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-04-02 15:51 ` Aaron Ecay
2015-04-02 17:38 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-04-06 18:51 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-06-16 19:36 ` Matt Price
2015-06-18 22:44 ` Richard Lawrence
2015-04-02 19:17 ` Rasmus [this message]
2015-04-03 2:56 ` Richard Lawrence
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.orgmode.org/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87mw2qtk4x.fsf@gmx.us \
--to=rasmus@gmx.us \
--cc=emacs-orgmode@gnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs/org-mode.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).