From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Reschedule "++" repeaters on same day if in future
Date: Fri, 01 Jul 2016 11:27:12 +0200
Message-ID: <87mvm1iu8f.fsf@saiph.selenimh>
References: <CABSfPErH7wAAwuQRkuppyQz1txYx-mUjDM5vDJvAZw35yC_aPQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<87poqy27p5.fsf@saiph.selenimh>
	<CABSfPEoHd-xuG-TsNkSVRWs0znehFcdKRx4AR-V=NohY0_Mdag@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52478)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1bIujJ-0001YP-2b
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 05:27:21 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1bIujH-0007uf-0z
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 05:27:19 -0400
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:55311)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1bIujG-0007uE-Qa
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jul 2016 05:27:18 -0400
In-Reply-To: <CABSfPEoHd-xuG-TsNkSVRWs0znehFcdKRx4AR-V=NohY0_Mdag@mail.gmail.com>
	(Don March's message of "Thu, 30 Jun 2016 19:07:13 -0400")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Don March <don@donmarch.net>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Don March <don@donmarch.net> writes:

> You're right about both things.  I updated the patch, and also added an
> example to the manual.  If that's not what you had it mind, let me know
> or feel free to edit.

Thank you. 

I used (not (time-less-p (current-time) time)) as suggested instead, so
as to take into consideration the (granted, highly unlikely) case of
time equality, and pushed to master.

Would you mind providing a note about this change in ORG-NEWS?


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou