From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Bug with behavior of point in cycle commands?
Date: Sat, 24 Sep 2016 00:38:44 +0200
Message-ID: <87mviyi6mj.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <87lgyjzfb3.fsf@alphapapa.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48135)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1bnZ7I-00078r-D5
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 18:38:49 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1bnZ7F-0001vX-V3
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 18:38:47 -0400
Received: from relay4-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::196]:34941)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1bnZ7F-0001vC-Oz
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 18:38:45 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87lgyjzfb3.fsf@alphapapa.net> (Adam Porter's message of "Thu, 22
	Sep 2016 18:26:56 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Adam Porter <adam@alphapapa.net>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Adam Porter <adam@alphapapa.net> writes:

> I came across this discussion today:
>
> http://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/27210/how-to-prevent-org-global-cycle-glitch
>
> It seems like a bug to me, because the visual position of the point does
> not match its actual position.  Shouldn't the cycle commands adjust the
> point to match where it appears after cycling?

`org-cycle' is about visibility, it is not supposed to move point. E.g.,
You may want to have an overview of the document an get back to where
you were editing text.

Cycling visibility back to original state is not configurable, though.
It calls `org-show-entry'. We could use `org-show-set-visibility'
instead, with the `default' context.

Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou