From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nick Dokos Subject: Re: [RFC] Change visibility for bracket links Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2016 13:18:27 -0400 Message-ID: <87mvi888ws.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87bmyyold3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87twcgl9vi.fsf@gmx.us> <87wphc8bwn.fsf@gmail.com> <63f76e8c-76e9-2b5a-838f-990febbfccfc@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:54823) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bujet-0007XP-4F for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 13:19:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bujep-0006zM-S5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 13:19:07 -0400 Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=59346 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bujep-0006y7-Lq for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 13:19:03 -0400 Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1bujeW-0002eQ-ID for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Oct 2016 19:18:44 +0200 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Clément Pit--Claudel writes: > On 2016-10-13 12:13, Nick Dokos wrote: >>> > >>> > But when the cursor is next to the link or emphasized text markers are >>> > shown. >>> > >>> > Pre text |[description] post text >>> > Pre text |*bold text* post text >>> > >>> > It would not cause much jumping. Of course, for people who wants to avoid >>> > jumping altogether org-hide-emphasis-markers could be set to nil. It >>> > would arguably make org-hide-emphasis-markers more useful for emphasized >>> > text as well. >>> > >> I'm worried that this would be computationally prohibitive. > > I think we have evidence to the contrary: prettify-symbols-mode works > fine, even with unprettify-at-point. Doesn't it? > I don't know: I've never used it, so I haven't done any performance measurements on it. But I worry (about a lot of things, not just this :-) ). -- Nick