Juan Manuel Macías <maciaschain@posteo.net> writes:

>> Although I am still a bit hesitant to remove
>> `org-latex-line-break-safe'.
>> What would be the benefit of removing it? For now, I mostly just see
>> that it will make the life harder for users in Scenario B.
>
> It's a complicated situation, because we now have two solutions to the
> same problem... It certainly sounds a bit abrupt to remove
> org-latex-line-break-safe (at least for now). I see no problem in both
> solutions coexisting. After all, the user can always give an "\\\\"
> value to org-latex-line-break-safe. The other possibility is that
> org-latex-line-break-safe is selectively deleted, as you mentioned in a
> previous email. In tables and verse blocks, unless I'm missing
> something, I think adding [0pt] would be unnecessary, with the new
> solution.

Upon looking closer into selective removal, it turned out to be more
tricky than I thought. I'm afraid that using \\[0pt] only in some places
may become a bit of headache to maintain - we may accidentally break
certain regexp replacements in `org-latex-verse-block'. In particular,
when verse contents is not straightforward and uses \\[0pt].

Given that `org-latex-line-break-safe' also introduced the problem with
verse blocks, I decided that it is better to remove it at the end.

See the attached tentative patchset.