From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: org mode's website margin Date: Sun, 09 Dec 2007 01:21:51 +0000 Message-ID: <87lk84d5n4.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87d4tknd5e.fsf@hillenius.net> <18264.20816.226854.753821@osprey.kermodei.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J1Aro-0003cV-T5 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:22:00 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1J1Aro-0003at-28 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:22:00 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1J1Arn-0003aN-S4 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:21:59 -0500 Received: from nf-out-0910.google.com ([64.233.182.184]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1J1Arm-0003ko-Ag for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 20:21:58 -0500 Received: by nf-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id f5so746618nfh for ; Sat, 08 Dec 2007 17:21:54 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <18264.20816.226854.753821@osprey.kermodei.com> (Mark Diekhans's message of "Thu, 6 Dec 2007 11:45:20 -0800") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Mark Diekhans Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Mark Diekhans writes: > Gijs Hillenius writes: >> Just noticed that (on this system) http://orgmode.org is incorrectly >> displayed. The pages displays with no left margin at all, which makes >> reading a bit difficult. Something changed? Or should I be looking at >> my firefox? > > The page is not valid HTML, here is what tidy reports: Apart from the validation of http://orgmode.org index page, did you remark any issue with the validation of the HTML output? I made some test, and they looked ok, except for code like
 being
included in 

-- but the ratio importance of the issue/difficulty to fix it is very low... If you find anything that could easily be fixed so that the HTML output validate a bit more, please send it! Thanks, -- Bastien