From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Robert D. Crawford" Subject: Re: feature request Date: Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:51:44 -0500 Message-ID: <87ljqtd5a7.fsf@comcast.net> References: <87hc1l0yvj.fsf@comcast.net> <87vdq0xz1i.fsf@kassiopeya.MSHEIMNETZ> <87fxh2euax.fsf@comcast.net> <874oxhpv81.fsf@MagnusOpus.khem> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LmUSf-0004PM-AG for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:52:09 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1LmUSZ-0004Mp-5K for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:52:07 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=38628 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1LmUSY-0004Me-IQ for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:52:02 -0400 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.229.2]:46467 helo=ciao.gmane.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LmUSY-0001gm-23 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:52:02 -0400 Received: from list by ciao.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.43) id 1LmUSS-0001g2-T3 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:51:57 +0000 Received: from c-98-211-29-41.hsd1.tn.comcast.net ([98.211.29.41]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:51:56 +0000 Received: from rdc1x by c-98-211-29-41.hsd1.tn.comcast.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:51:56 +0000 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello Charles, Charles Philip Chan writes: > "Robert D. Crawford" writes: > >> I use emacs and emacspeak almost exclusively for my computing >> needs. Sorry I wasn't clear in my needs and use. > > I am curious as to why you are using w3, since, from what I have read, > emacspeak supports w3m as well: That is true. > w3 is so slow and feature incomplete. Slow, yes. Feature incomplete, no. There are several things w3 can do that w3m cannot. Table navigation, support for aural css, fontification of all tags (pre, code, and the like immediately come to mind), different attributes for h[1-6] tags, I am aware of nothing w3m can do that w3 cannot. Also, since w3 is pure lisp it can be extended in ways that w3m cannot. rdc -- Robert D. Crawford rdc1x@comcast.net