From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Re: Worg needs some reorganizing Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 20:52:28 +0100 Message-ID: <87lj2ij8g3.fsf@gnu.org> References: <4CAD81B0.6090807@manor-farm.org> <0E084C6C-6FD1-4C74-BD9F-34F2830B93C5@gmail.com> <87bp6ytacd.fsf_-_@stats.ox.ac.uk> <87fwsubckf.fsf@gnu.org> <87aaj2w5x4.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87d3nyuhkw.fsf@altern.org> <87aaj0kggo.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkr0load.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87pqrwipjd.fsf@gmail.com> <87oc7glhef.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd8ins8.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipxolgji.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87aaj0iiff.fsf@gmail.com> <87r5cbk28p.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87fwsrtokh.fsf@gnu.org> <87fwsrjtnx.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87hbd7jr42.fsf@gmail.com> <87k4i2fa7l.fsf@gmail.com> <87vd1mgnip.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> <87k4i2gh08.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44552 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PfHdJ-0003k7-OK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:54:44 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfHd3-00046Q-IF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:54:25 -0500 Received: from mail-ww0-f41.google.com ([74.125.82.41]:46595) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PfHd2-00045r-CS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:54:09 -0500 Received: by wwi18 with SMTP id 18so3606364wwi.0 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 11:54:03 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87k4i2gh08.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> (Jason Dunsmore's message of "Tue, 18 Jan 2011 13:15:51 -0600") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Jason Dunsmore Cc: Dan Davison , Ian Barton , Matt Lundin , emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik Jason Dunsmore writes: > I made a version of the FAQ without the javascript folding: > > http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg/org-faq-nojs.html > http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg/org-faq.html Thanks. Nitpicking: I'd prefer paragraphs to be indented to the right (so that headines are always left from the text) But just a matter of taste, of course. > It like it better, but it's still a bit unwieldy. Maybe the FAQ just > needs to be reorganized. See how Wikipedia does it: > > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FAQ > http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FAQ_Index > > Matt or Bastien, do you have an opinion on reorganizing the FAQ? I don't have a strong opinion about this: splitting the FAQ into org-faq-*.org comes to my mind, but it's a big task. org-info-js, while not optimal for *every* page on Worg, was doing a good job on the FAQ. -- Bastien