From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Org expert mode? Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2011 09:28:18 +0100 Message-ID: <87lj0moycd.fsf@gnu.org> References: <87vczre1eb.fsf@altern.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=60216 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PxxiG-0008Cs-QV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 03:28:46 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PxxiF-0006Gi-NF for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 03:28:44 -0500 Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:58619) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PxxiF-0006GV-HM for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 03:28:43 -0500 Received: by wwc33 with SMTP id 33so2445650wwc.30 for ; Fri, 11 Mar 2011 00:28:42 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87vczre1eb.fsf@altern.org> (Bastien's message of "Thu, 10 Mar 2011 11:05:32 +0100") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Thanks all for this great discussion. I close this thread now: there is a nice consensus on not taking the direction of an "expert mode", and that notion was ill-defined anyway. Reading all this feedback, I feel confident that the community will be vigilant and tell me if any new feature somehow disrupts the balance we have between usability / feature-richness. Best, -- Bastien