From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <eric.schulte@gmx.com>
Subject: Re: :noweb header argument
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2012 10:17:32 -0700
Message-ID: <87lipep39v.fsf@gmx.com>
References: <m139bpaja0.fsf@tsdye.com> <801ur8rnjg.fsf@somewhere.org>
	<m1boqba7ks.fsf@tsdye.com> <87ty43ik2y.fsf@gmx.com>
	<m1ehv78kmc.fsf@tsdye.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:55631)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eric.schulte@gmx.com>) id 1Rl1nz-00048f-GN
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:17:52 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eric.schulte@gmx.com>) id 1Rl1nx-0005WS-8d
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:17:43 -0500
Received: from mailout-us.gmx.com ([74.208.5.67]:49944)
	by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <eric.schulte@gmx.com>) id 1Rl1nw-0005W8-Mi
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jan 2012 12:17:41 -0500
In-Reply-To: <m1ehv78kmc.fsf@tsdye.com> (Thomas S. Dye's message of "Tue, 10
	Jan 2012 08:42:35 -1000")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: "Thomas S. Dye" <tsd@tsdye.com>
Cc: Sebastien Vauban <wxhgmqzgwmuf@spammotel.com>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

>>>>> | tangle | -    | +      | -      |
>>>>> |--------+------+--------+--------|
>>>>> | need   | +    | +      | -      |
>>>>>
>>
>> What should the name for such an option be?
>>
>
> Andreas' suggestion, :noweb no-export, seems right to me.
>

Me too,

I've just pushed up a patch adding a "no-export" option to the :noweb
header argument.  If I could be so bold as to impose on you for a
correlate documentation patch... :)

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte/