From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: are super-hidden technical blocks required? Date: Mon, 06 Aug 2012 00:20:56 +0200 Message-ID: <87lihtasl3.fsf@gmail.com> References: <20120730144259.GA1017@nausicaa.localdomain> <873941bsvs.fsf@gnu.org> <501ED1B7.5070808@alum.mit.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33665) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sy9FS-00037m-FV for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 18:24:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sy9FR-0000wM-IK for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 18:24:34 -0400 Received: from mail-wg0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:63307) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Sy9FR-0000wG-Bx for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 18:24:33 -0400 Received: by wgbez12 with SMTP id ez12so1582455wgb.30 for ; Sun, 05 Aug 2012 15:24:32 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <501ED1B7.5070808@alum.mit.edu> (Ilya Shlyakhter's message of "Sun, 05 Aug 2012 16:04:07 -0400") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Ilya Shlyakhter Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, > What about a HIDDEN_PROPERTIES drawer that, when folded, folds > completely (so that its title line is hidden too), and have a key to > reveal such drawers (the way M-tab opens archived entries)? This is begging for problems. At some point, an user will start to notice weird behaviour he cannot explain from, let's say, the exporter, because he will have completely forgotten about one totally hidden drawer setting export options. I don't think anything should be made totally invisible. There should always be visual clues for such things. PROPERTIES drawer is as hidden as it can decently be. Since its contents are mostly for Org internals, the average user is, usually, not supposed to expand it. If you often need to have a look at some properties, you may use column view instead. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou