From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Daimrod Subject: Re: OBBDB(3) or org-contacts Date: Mon, 14 Jan 2013 14:27:19 +0100 Message-ID: <87libv51zc.fsf@casa.home> References: <0lobgzh9xi.fsf@wjh.hardakers.net> <20130108205311.53d52a0e@atmarama.noip.me> <87obgsbuyd.fsf@ucl.ac.uk> <20130114130450.GC8679@cardamom.adamsinfoserv.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:60521) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tuk2p-0001ba-22 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 08:25:49 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tuk2n-00038a-KS for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 08:25:42 -0500 Received: from mail-bk0-f49.google.com ([209.85.214.49]:46524) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Tuk2n-00038F-DD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 08:25:41 -0500 Received: by mail-bk0-f49.google.com with SMTP id jm19so1988389bkc.36 for ; Mon, 14 Jan 2013 05:25:38 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20130114130450.GC8679@cardamom.adamsinfoserv.com> (Russell Adams's message of "Mon, 14 Jan 2013 07:04:50 -0600") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Cc: Gour --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Russell Adams writes: >> I am a confirmed gnus user. No other email system comes close to >> doing what gnus can do. Given the large volume of email I get, >> splitting and scoring are essential to survival! Integration with >> bbdb is also obviously key for me. > > Slightly offtopic, but I'm a Mutt user that's eyeballed Gnus from a > distance for years. Could you elaborate on some of your favorite Gnus > features? He named it, splitting and scoring. The ability to easily mark a whole thread as important or unimportant combined with expunged is (imo) essential to manage large volume of email. The expunge facility let me hide threads; when a message is expunged it is not only marked as read, it just doesn't appear at all unless I specifically ask otherwise. OTOH when the score of a thread is increased, all messages in this thread (old and new) will appear in bold. =2D-=20 Daimrod/Greg --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJQ9Ae6AAoJEBNzVHcrZRiUEdYP/2pRqBMQoll5GtopLTGV2dEy tWj2pMXu89QFph+HiAYllHhH34WbOdL0mMaqNSGIi4Dx5YQKLeIwiGPyhsSon10M sgA+/4jOziuCnu6DZamn90CwKpBfPFQm0IhWYVL6q2elMVHuGfRo/7v/9Z6qArE7 K3/CEjMO+WFkfFlvn8Jlc+6EtU4WlIXQ59ygAcTFLZD012kZQ1P91KKjxn2DDlEW bm+FeQuutICAFpsFryccL9/nph0jpqfLZY4Xo7h9y1Z4DNfJTU37gTYFjfi9qik4 m+gdoNN8LREkw3/8p5diOhJQZjP/dqu6SrU7kcqL5n+5rlq7kVXqKIml+9nx9rrY SyIgYNJL99auwxLPIuTCjk5UTyZZVPIRBNOmYnb0v15LfuPeMoNWf754Vhd8S6Yb DTkr8JSGOP+0goE/fbIkZ2g4m/R/tP1szGSyzZd4mqu4a+bphI+QXgpRrNkJTQc6 Q/rRRv0bhQAJTx9cvAbXX+kNVbfnFF3t8ezN9s/D+1L6Khut/V9PG/Ps+fL+TNJ6 X8InJUnOuW++3tH//KYUokDrVlA4yhh+J3EZSIBN9G/QsdN83j0JMbbekTgbehoI YQNfuKjkfx+Ft0y1D8pVj3Hy7iJA4MGnyh+EZvgMEiiW/6l+ZlEUyksKhh0XycDP D/EC2xX2YT0gcsd88A3R =qTJM -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--