From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thorsten Jolitz Subject: Re: [ANN] outorg.el -- reverse Org-Babel Date: Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:05:46 +0100 Message-ID: <87liat7hl1.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87mwvabeuk.fsf@gmail.com> <86r4kmffqc.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> <87ip5yb4xl.fsf@gmail.com> <86wquedtg1.fsf@iro.umontreal.ca> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:44576) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5GUx-0000JG-Hy for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 09:06:20 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5GUv-00084X-RR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 09:06:15 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:35015) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1U5GUv-00084P-Ke for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 09:06:13 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1U5GV2-0005k4-Th for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:06:20 +0100 Received: from e178056063.adsl.alicedsl.de ([85.178.56.63]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:06:20 +0100 Received: from tjolitz by e178056063.adsl.alicedsl.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Tue, 12 Feb 2013 15:06:20 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org François Pinard writes: > Thorsten Jolitz writes: > >> [about the nearly coincident publication of *outorg* and *poporg*] >> What a bad luck ... ;( > > Oh, I'm not much into authorship wars, you know, as long as the need > gets covered. Free time being a scarce resource (for me at least!), I > prefer when we can all make the best use of it. > > Keep happy! Thanks, I really did miss your anouncement, and it was not the feedback I was looking for to hear that another (after looking at your code: better and more refined) version of the idea already exists. A bit discouraging, I must admit. So I consider 'outorg' now as a private project for my private use. Keep going with 'poporg' and make it part of emacs/org-mode - and look at 'outorg' as a proof that there is definitely a need out there that should get covered. -- cheers, Thorsten