From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC] Small syntax change for footnote definitions
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2013 19:43:03 +0100
Message-ID: <87liah1pag.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <8738wp3euv.fsf@gmail.com>
	<CAJcAo8voMWBz1S3UapZmKRH5SdJJhwYmd1bHsv1TavYdSKzFPQ@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:37995)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1U8bCw-0006Eu-CR
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:49:30 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1U8bCq-0001qL-2s
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:49:26 -0500
Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com ([209.85.212.174]:36026)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <n.goaziou@gmail.com>) id 1U8bCp-0001pu-SH
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 13:49:19 -0500
Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id hi8so7935355wib.13
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 21 Feb 2013 10:49:19 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAJcAo8voMWBz1S3UapZmKRH5SdJJhwYmd1bHsv1TavYdSKzFPQ@mail.gmail.com>
	(Samuel Wales's message of "Thu, 21 Feb 2013 11:07:15 -0700")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com>
Cc: Org Mode List <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Samuel Wales <samologist@gmail.com> writes:

> Does this allow blank lines to separate paragraphs in inline footnote
> definitions?

No. Inline definitions stay inlined and as such, cannot contain blank
lines. My proposal is only about full footnote definitions.

> If so, it sounds very good.
>
> I presume we can still do
>
> ===
>   1) a
>
> b.
>
>   1) c
> ===

Yes, the limitation is only about two consecutive lists. In this case,
they are not consecutive.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou