From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Should org-catch-invisible-edits default to non-nil? (was: Editing folded headlines and ellipses) Date: Tue, 12 Mar 2013 15:21:53 +0100 Message-ID: <87li9s3dha.fsf_-_@bzg.ath.cx> References: <20130310003718.GA6483@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <87k3pfbntp.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <20130310095715.GB6483@kuru.dyndns-at-home.com> <513de46c.c455b40a.047b.48b5@mx.google.com> <87boao4wig.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <513f315e.c462b40a.36eb.2dd8@mx.google.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:53841) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UFQ5V-0001GD-9J for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:21:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UFQ5T-0003o3-JD for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:21:57 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com ([2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]:42710) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UFQ5T-0003nA-BW for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:21:55 -0400 Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id hq4so1871133wib.12 for ; Tue, 12 Mar 2013 07:21:54 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <513f315e.c462b40a.36eb.2dd8@mx.google.com> (Darlan Cavalcante Moreira's message of "Tue, 12 Mar 2013 10:44:58 -0300") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Darlan Cavalcante Moreira Cc: Emacs Org mode Hi Darlan, Mhh... yes, I see. I'm not against changing the default for `org-catch-invisible-edits' but I'd like to know what other contributors think. So here it is: what do you guys think the defauld should be? Thanks, -- Bastien