From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca>
Subject: Re: New Exporter BUG/Change in behaviour
Date: Fri, 05 Apr 2013 15:04:00 -0400
Message-ID: <87li8wyf33.fsf@norang.ca>
References: <87ppy8yl60.fsf@norang.ca> <87hajkx1rv.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:55292)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1UOBvg-0002fu-Qy
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 15:04:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1UOBvf-0000vK-He
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 15:04:04 -0400
Received: from mho-03-ewr.mailhop.org ([204.13.248.66]:52532
	helo=mho-01-ewr.mailhop.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <bernt@norang.ca>) id 1UOBvf-0000v5-ER
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 05 Apr 2013 15:04:03 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87hajkx1rv.fsf@gmail.com> (Nicolas Goaziou's message of "Fri, 05
	Apr 2013 20:36:52 +0200")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Nicolas Goaziou <n.goaziou@gmail.com> writes:

> Hello,
>
> Bernt Hansen <bernt@norang.ca> writes:
>
>> Is this a bug?
>
> No, it isn't.
>
>> My current workaround is to delete the global #+OPTIONS
>> line (but that doesn't feel right since I have to add it back to export
>> what is left to do for the entire file when sharing it with others).  I
>> regularly export small subtrees (with C-c @) to copy ASCII / HTML export
>> results to emails so the old exporter behaviour was much more
>> predictable in the results I would get when using C-c @.
>
> The new exporter distinguishes between subtree export (toggled with C-s
> key within the dispatcher) and region export. In the old exporter, C-c @
> + export command would give you a subtree export. This is not the case
> in the new exporter. You have to explicitly mention you want a subtree
> export. On the other hand, you don't need to select a region beforehand.
> In other words, you don't trigger a subtree export anymore with C-c @
> (but it triggers a region export).
>
> If you export a subtree in the new exporter jargon, you can override
> locally #+options: line by setting top headline's :EXPORT_OPTIONS:
> property to an appropriate value, e. g. :EXPORT_OPTIONS: tasks:t.

Thanks for the clarification!  I'll give it a whirl :)

Regards,
Bernt