From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Error with :wrap org in babel and 8.0-pre
Date: Mon, 15 Apr 2013 12:12:44 -0600
Message-ID: <87li8jfysj.fsf@gmail.com>
References: <CA+M2ft_jQf=KsTviYGx2w+DX8j8NyF2QJdVEjWVW8KaD-J6sBA@mail.gmail.com>
	<87li8ncqzq.fsf@gmail.com>
	<CA+M2ft8x1w=X5OPp4JvcY_S_fpaW4R5eyZg5BS+Jh=RDCKe2Tg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:33935)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1URnuE-0005vK-8s
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:13:31 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1URnu8-0007tV-Pz
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:13:30 -0400
Received: from mail-pd0-f170.google.com ([209.85.192.170]:60810)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <schulte.eric@gmail.com>) id 1URnu8-0007tD-G3
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 14:13:24 -0400
Received: by mail-pd0-f170.google.com with SMTP id 10so2643643pdi.15
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Mon, 15 Apr 2013 11:13:23 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+M2ft8x1w=X5OPp4JvcY_S_fpaW4R5eyZg5BS+Jh=RDCKe2Tg@mail.gmail.com>
	(John Hendy's message of "Mon, 15 Apr 2013 12:59:55 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com> writes:

> On Fri, Apr 12, 2013 at 5:24 PM, Eric Schulte <schulte.eric@gmail.com> wrote:
>> John Hendy <jw.hendy@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> I thought this was the proper syntax for printing stuff directly to a
>>> LaTeX document:
>>>
>>> #+begin_src R :session :exports results :results output :wrap org
>>>
>>
>> I think you want either ":results latex" or ":wrap latex".
>>
>
> Trying my best to follow the evolution here.... I've tried to discern
> from the manual and Worg the best way to do something, generally try
> it and fail. Then I post to the list and get an answer. A short time
> later, I try doing what I think is approximately the same thing to
> find that it seems to have changed since the last time:
>
> To print multiple file names and =#+attr_stuff= options, the answer
> was =:results output org :exports results=
> - http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2012-08/msg01224.html
>
> Trying to do the same exact thing a bit later was =:results output
> wrap=, shortly followed up with the instruction to use =:wrap org=
> - http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-03/msg01599.html
>
> Now, it's =:wrap latex=, but I'm not sure why.
>

I may have miss-understood your question.

>
> Is =:wrap org= appropriate for anything?

Use :wrap latex if your code block produces raw latex.  E.g.,

    #+begin_src sh :results output :wrap latex
    cat <<EOF
    \begin{tabular}{rr}
    a & b\\
    \hline
    1 & 2\\
    \end{tabular}
    EOF
    #+end_src

    #+RESULTS:
    #+BEGIN_latex
    \begin{tabular}{rr}
    a & b\
    \hline
    1 & 2\
    \end{tabular}
    #+END_latex


Use :wrap org if your code block produces raw org. E.g.,

    #+begin_src sh :results output :wrap org
    cat <<EOF
    | a | b |
    |---+---|
    | 1 | 2 |
    EOF
    #+end_src

    #+RESULTS:
    #+BEGIN_org
    | a | b |
    |---+---|
    | 1 | 2 |
    #+END_org

Let me know if that leave any mysteries or doesn't address part of your
question.  I apologize for any contribution my often terse and hurried
responses have made to this confusion.

-- 
Eric Schulte
http://cs.unm.edu/~eschulte