From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Rasmus <rasmus@gmx.us>
Subject: Re: Should comments break paragraphs?
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:47:55 +0200
Message-ID: <87li5445l0.fsf@gmx.us>
References: <51E443F6.2050104@arfer.net> <87mwpnfybn.fsf@gmail.com>
	<51E47BC1.7010808@gmail.com> <87ip0byoqg.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87fvvev771.fsf@gmail.com> <87wqoqxznb.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87ppuitp8y.fsf@gmail.com> <87sizexuj9.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87li55lpqd.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87mwplk645.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87fvvdk3es.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87ip09k1d4.fsf@gmail.com>
	<878v15jqdy.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <m2haftiao8.fsf@krugs.de>
	<87d2qhguou.fsf@gmx.us> <878v156ucl.fsf@ucl.ac.uk>
	<m2fvvcz6y7.fsf@uio.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:42442)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1Uzjsi-0006UO-JA
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 04:48:13 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1Uzjsh-0000V9-Cj
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 04:48:12 -0400
Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:50542)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1Uzjsh-0000V2-5w
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 04:48:11 -0400
Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1Uzjsf-0001eF-2p
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:48:09 +0200
Received: from business-213-023-238-209.static.arcor-ip.net ([213.23.238.209])
	by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian))
	id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:48:09 +0200
Received: from rasmus by business-213-023-238-209.static.arcor-ip.net with
	local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00
	for <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>; Thu, 18 Jul 2013 10:48:09 +0200
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Christian Moe <mail@christianmoe.com> writes:

>>> show up on the side of the documents.  Again, I don't agree that they
>>> are comments in the sense that '^#.*' is a comment.  Again, I think
>>> the correct approach for adding such notes is inlinetasks.
>>
>> +1
>>
>> Comments are internal to the org file and should not be
>> exported.
>
> +1
>
> There is also a #+begin_annotation block special to ODT export, and
> there was some talk about devising a backend-agnostic solution along
> those lines for comments that one /does/ want exported.

I wasn't aware of begin_annotation.  That's cool.  Yeah, a backed
agnostic note syntax would be cool.  I'd go with inlinetasks, but I'm
also happy with begin_annotation.  

A good thing about inlinetasks is that they can be turned off (from
export) easily.

pdfcomment for LaTeX is cool, but poorly supported by Evince, but
works great in the Mozilla Aurora.  And there's already Nicolas'
boxes.

I don't know how it could be added meaningfully to html, but it should
be pretty doable.

–Rasmus

-- 
Er du tosset for noge' lårt!