From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Rasmus Subject: Re: footnote fontify causing massive slowdown Date: Sun, 06 Dec 2015 00:42:56 +0100 Message-ID: <87lh98o41r.fsf@gmx.us> References: <87egf1qcgn.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38932) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5MTs-00070J-C0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 18:43:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5MTp-0000N1-5i for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 18:43:08 -0500 Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:44518) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a5MTo-0000Mt-VU for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sat, 05 Dec 2015 18:43:05 -0500 Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a5MTm-0003bk-V0 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 06 Dec 2015 00:43:03 +0100 Received: from ip5f5ada90.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de ([95.90.218.144]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 06 Dec 2015 00:43:02 +0100 Received: from rasmus by ip5f5ada90.dynamic.kabel-deutschland.de with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sun, 06 Dec 2015 00:43:02 +0100 List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Nicolas Goaziou writes: > However, this report raises an interesting question about footnotes: > should we still support plain (e.g., "[1]") footnotes in Org documents? > > The pattern is very common an regularly introduces false positives. > Also, IIRC, it was introduced for non-Org buffers (e.g., in Message mode > buffers), to provide some common features with "footnote.el" library. > > I think we could remove this kind of footnotes, and yet preserve > `org-footnote-normalize' to change Org footnotes into these ones, for > foreign documents. > > WDYT? I'd be happy to kill [n] style footnotes. I've had issues with them in the past. Rasmus -- Not everything that goes around comes back around, you know