From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: Bug: CALL misbehavior with :results verbatim [8.3.4
 (8.3.4-5-gdc68d2-elpaplus @
 /Users/rossdonaldson/.emacs.d/elpa/org-plus-contrib-20160229/)]
Date: Sun, 03 Apr 2016 11:00:56 +0200
Message-ID: <87lh4v12yf.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <m14mcksfer.fsf@gmail.com> <874mc6vyby.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
	<87h9g6gevo.fsf@gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:47542)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1amdrt-00013a-44
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 04:58:49 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1amdrs-0002Mb-7p
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 04:58:49 -0400
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:35749)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1amdrs-0002MX-26
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 03 Apr 2016 04:58:48 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87h9g6gevo.fsf@gmail.com> (Ross Donaldson's message of "Wed, 16
	Mar 2016 16:52:11 -0700")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Ross Donaldson <gastove@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Hello,

Ross Donaldson <gastove@gmail.com> writes:

> Nicolas --
>
>> Isn't it the point of the "verbatim" parameter?
>
> I didn't think so, no. Certainly, it doesn't behave this way in any other context, nor does the documentation make me think it should.
>
>> What did you expect instead?
>
> I expect the results of a call block to be the same as from evaluating the named src block directly. Why would I expect anything else?

I don't know. I am not sure about the meaning of "verbatim". I was
hoping for an explanation.

Anyway, I investigated a bit. see
<http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.orgmode/106015> for some more information.


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou