From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Adam Porter <adam@alphapapa.net>
Subject: Bug with behavior of point in cycle commands?
Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2016 18:26:56 -0500
Message-ID: <87lgyjzfb3.fsf@alphapapa.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56477)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1bnDOs-0005ay-U9
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 19:27:32 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1bnDOo-0006Ss-3S
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 19:27:30 -0400
Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=43199 helo=blaine.gmane.org)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1bnDOn-0006Oy-TJ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Sep 2016 19:27:26 -0400
Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1bnDOf-0001hZ-D4
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 23 Sep 2016 01:27:17 +0200
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

I came across this discussion today:

http://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/27210/how-to-prevent-org-global-cycle-glitch

It seems like a bug to me, because the visual position of the point does
not match its actual position.  Shouldn't the cycle commands adjust the
point to match where it appears after cycling?