From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Subject: Re: extra paragraph in image export?
Date: Sun, 22 Jan 2017 14:18:47 +0100
Message-ID: <87lgu3b5c8.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
References: <CAN_Dec9f0-pD2igeDW7rzU29Re36TML70c0Yyqrv3JhAFVp3sg@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53018)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1cVI2q-00073F-6d
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 08:18:57 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>) id 1cVI2p-0002z1-1k
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 08:18:56 -0500
Received: from relay3-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::195]:44291)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr>)
	id 1cVI2o-0002yw-Rf
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 22 Jan 2017 08:18:54 -0500
In-Reply-To: <CAN_Dec9f0-pD2igeDW7rzU29Re36TML70c0Yyqrv3JhAFVp3sg@mail.gmail.com>
	(Matt Price's message of "Sat, 21 Jan 2017 11:26:29 -0500")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Matt Price <moptop99@gmail.com>
Cc: Org Mode <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>

Hello,

Matt Price <moptop99@gmail.com> writes:

> with org-html-html5-fancy is non-nil, images are exported with something
> like this code:
>
> <figure>
> <p><img src="https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/proof_2x.png" alt="proof_2x.png"
> class="fragment (appear) visible current-fragment"
> data-fragment-index="0"></p>
> </figure>
>
>
> At least in ox-reveal, this makes it quite difficult to address images
> separately from text (e.g., to set the text-align property appropriately.
> You can try this if you have ox-reveal installed with any simple image:
> ----------
> * Test
> [[https://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/proof_2x.png]]
>
> --------
> At least on my machine, the image won't be centered in the resultant slide,
> and it will be hard to construct CSS to fix the issue.
>
> Is there a strong reason to include the <p> tag? I've removed it from
> org-html--wrap-image and haven't noticed any ill effects so far, but
> haven't done much testing.

I'm not well-versed enough in HTML to answer this, but, from Org POV,
there should be a difference between

  A paragraph

  #+caption: foo
  [[block-image.png]]

  Another paragraph


and

  A paragraph with an [[inline-image.png]] and some text following.

Would removing the <p> tag blur the difference between the two examples
above ?


Regards,

-- 
Nicolas Goaziou