From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Nicolas Goaziou Subject: Re: Bug: Bulk reschedule with reschedule logging on fails Date: Fri, 12 May 2017 00:41:23 +0200 Message-ID: <87lgq310fg.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> References: <87vb4mw2l3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <87lgq6sffa.fsf@felesatra.moe> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56203) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8wm3-0000U3-8M for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 18:41:32 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8wly-0006Us-DE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 18:41:31 -0400 Received: from relay7-d.mail.gandi.net ([2001:4b98:c:538::200]:60598) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d8wly-0006Ts-6T for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 11 May 2017 18:41:26 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87lgq6sffa.fsf@felesatra.moe> (Allen Li's message of "Mon, 08 May 2017 23:38:33 -0700") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: Allen Li Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hello, Allen Li writes: > Allen Li writes: > >> I can think of three reasonable options: >> >> 1. Prompt for a note, then apply it to all affected items. >> 2. Prompt for a note, then apply it only to items that are already >> scheduled (and hence rescheduled). >> 3. Don't attempt to add a note and just add timestamps. > > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > >> It is fixed, with option 3. Global note doesn't sound like a silver >> bullet. Also, 3 was much easier to implement. > > I believe that this bug has not been fixed for =E2=80=98org-log-redeadlin= e=E2=80=99 as I > have encountered it recently, but I have not done a clean repro of it > yet (although I think such a repro may not be necessary). Correct. Fixed, this time. Thanks for the heads-up. Regards, --=20 Nicolas Goaziou