From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es>
Subject: Re: [Radio tables???]
Date: Mon, 09 Apr 2018 18:03:30 +0200
Message-ID: <87lgdwjrjh.fsf@mat.ucm.es>
References: <87shbrm7f5.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr> <871sfon5wj.fsf@mat.ucm.es>
	<87zi2cy3z3.fsf@nicolasgoaziou.fr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48143)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1f5ZGj-0003CI-Ht
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 12:03:46 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1f5ZGf-0007Po-2m
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 12:03:45 -0400
Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=49926 helo=blaine.gmane.org)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>)
	id 1f5ZGe-0007N3-SM
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 12:03:41 -0400
Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <geo-emacs-orgmode@m.gmane.org>) id 1f5ZEU-0006qj-Rs
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 09 Apr 2018 18:01:26 +0200
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

>>> "Nicolas" == Nicolas Goaziou <mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr> writes:

   > Hello,
   > Uwe Brauer <oub@mat.ucm.es> writes:

   >> This is really bad. That is a feature I daily use in latex
   >> buffers. Why did you do this? Is there any substitute for it. With
   >> a similar syntax?
   >> 
   >> If not tons of my latex files which contain radio tables will be
   >> useless.

   > I removed radio _lists_ not radio _tables_.

Thanks for the clarification and sorry for the noise.


Regards


   > Regards,