From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Marcin Borkowski <mbork@mbork.pl>
Subject: Re: An Org-based productivity tool
Date: Sun, 14 Oct 2018 10:22:31 +0200
Message-ID: <87lg719bug.fsf@mbork.pl>
References: <87efcxaibq.fsf@mbork.pl>
	<87tvlsc11r.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50957)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@mbork.pl>) id 1gBbgr-0007t7-NM
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 04:23:58 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@mbork.pl>) id 1gBbgo-0000af-FP
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 04:23:57 -0400
Received: from mail.mojserwer.eu ([195.110.48.8]:34368)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <mbork@mbork.pl>) id 1gBbgo-0000aX-7q
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Sun, 14 Oct 2018 04:23:54 -0400
In-reply-to: <87tvlsc11r.fsf@yantar92-laptop.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me>
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Emacs-orgmode"
	<emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@gmail.com>
Cc: Org-Mode mailing list <emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>


On 2018-10-11, at 10:58, Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> One suggestion would be to distinguish between different types of work.
> For example, you may value more an important project you need to work
> on, but do not like, in comparison with another project you really like
> doing.
> This can be done, for example, by weighting the time spent on
> different tasks according to the task urgency/arbitrary multiplier.

I will think about it, thanks!

> A comment on the example output.
> Some people (like me) can spend too much time just staring at the kind
> of output you provided.
> I found it more efficient to have a single number/phrase indication if I
> need to work harder or not.
> The full output might still be shown to adjust the overall productivity,
> but, say, once per day/week.

Good point.  As I said, it is a prototype, and I admit that the output
sucks a lot.  OTOH, I'm somewhat of a gamer, and I like economic,
spreadsheet-y games, so this scratches that itch for me.

Best,

--
Marcin Borkowski
http://mbork.pl