From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gustavo Barros Subject: Re: Scheduling in a narrowed subtree: Bug? Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2019 18:10:17 -0300 Message-ID: <87lfuvyi12.fsf@gmail.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:46779) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1i7nP7-0002iX-10 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 17:10:25 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i7nP5-0002pf-RE for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 17:10:24 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x730.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::730]:34457) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1i7nP5-0002pF-LP for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 17:10:23 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-x730.google.com with SMTP id q203so18619262qke.1 for ; Tue, 10 Sep 2019 14:10:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (=?utf-8?Q?=22Micha=C3=ABl?= Cadilhac"'s message of "Mon, 9 Sep 2019 15:17:06 -0500") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" To: =?utf-8?Q?Micha=C3=ABl?= Cadilhac Cc: Org-Mode mailing list On Mon, Sep 09 2019, Micha=C3=ABl Cadilhac wrote: > Is this the expected behavior? > > 1. Create an empty org file > 2. Insert > * Test > * Test 2 > 3. With the cursor at Test, hit C-x n s to narrow the view to the Test su= btree > 4. Hit C-c C-s to schedule the line at any date. > > As a result, the SCHEDULED keyword is _not_ included in the narrow view, = and inserting things after the Test heading > moves the SCHEDULED keyword away from its second-line position. > > Cheers, > Micha=C3=ABl This is likely related to https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2019-07/msg00087.html Regards, Gustavo. PS: I had tried to send this yesterday, but I think I have screwed up the sending then. If this is gets to you in duplicity, my apologies for the noise.