From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id uKyrIUk4fV/XFQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:38:49 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id mBp7HUk4fV+rKwAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 07 Oct 2020 03:38:49 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A4920940393 for ; Wed, 7 Oct 2020 03:38:47 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:50032 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ0Ht-0000na-Qw for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 23:38:45 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:54618) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ0H2-0000nS-Vs for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 23:37:53 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com ([173.228.157.52]:53450) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kQ0Gz-0005QB-9v for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 06 Oct 2020 23:37:52 -0400 Received: from pb-smtp20.pobox.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707A5E7ED6; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 23:37:45 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from kyle@kyleam.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=pobox.com; h=from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version :content-type; s=sasl; bh=hZzBkNHKkcxnVOPivpY+sdOn/eo=; b=N10z1z APvbAEV9rEIesW3sqpFDrI+8+qSmC0trBMbUnilBw1O7/07WQo6CdQjDZJBzZYS5 brK0vQ1kgyZ31/73TTkidHJ8q04AbHhm1YYBXZjgKVO6AXSaXF6K6CkfNpRoMTrM 68MBIR953uv4yqrwH0s5DnH+ADHIoRmft26h0= Received: from pb-smtp20.sea.icgroup.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 693A9E7ED4; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 23:37:45 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from kyle@kyleam.com) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed; d=kyleam.com; h=from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=mesmtp; bh=cqfPjbOz0ZlPIRhbkLzX4fOYWiJ5jbYN1iOddPgKHZs=; b=RD5iFUySXaVQ8q2weOaeKuuHhSnAnrXXi3i+ioL6scH/vBGNAuXbWOMsLTErpmEXwIY9aCH640A3klFneF8Bp4LzDHtX7lyRnDJTr5erG7lR1IS0N99c70j1HHwbW6Y0E8s0J16B3sLX+pbWFnHNtZboX5MPxNgFKXvQ8MV6npM= Received: from localhost (unknown [45.33.91.115]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by pb-smtp20.pobox.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id DDA29E7ED3; Tue, 6 Oct 2020 23:37:42 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from kyle@kyleam.com) From: Kyle Meyer To: Jarmo Hurri Subject: Re: PATCH: Display point of code block point when confirming evaluation In-Reply-To: <87imbvrjud.fsf@kyleam.com> References: <87sglwoata.fsf@iki.fi> <87imbvrjud.fsf@kyleam.com> Date: Tue, 06 Oct 2020 23:37:40 -0400 Message-ID: <87lfgioge3.fsf@kyleam.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Pobox-Relay-ID: 750D84CE-084E-11EB-B893-E43E2BB96649-24757444!pb-smtp20.pobox.com Received-SPF: pass client-ip=173.228.157.52; envelope-from=kyle@kyleam.com; helo=pb-smtp20.pobox.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: First seen = 2020/10/06 23:37:45 X-ACL-Warn: Detected OS = Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=pobox.com header.s=sasl header.b=N10z1z A; dkim=pass header.d=kyleam.com header.s=mesmtp header.b=RD5iFUyS; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.21 X-TUID: if8NckXu7qRT Kyle Meyer writes: > That sounds reasonable to me, and the change looks fine to me. My only > thought is that perhaps the line number would be friendlier to report, > but I don't feel strongly about that. > > I'll wait a few days for any babel users to chime in and then apply > (unless you reply that you'd like to reroll it to use line numbers). A couple of votes came in favor of using line numbers here, and the idea of using the source block name was also brought up. (Thanks, Timothy and Eric, for the input.) Jarmo, what do you think?