From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id QCxIBbmdq1/rSQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:15:53 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id sKYRAbmdq19iXAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:15:53 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 981BD9404E0 for ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 08:15:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:59618 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kclIE-0007a2-RV for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 03:15:50 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:59462) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kclHR-0007ZU-6F for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 03:15:01 -0500 Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::e]:52410) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kclHQ-0007my-91; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 03:15:00 -0500 Received: from [2a01:e35:2fe1:f780:7aa7:aeb8:2bfe:be7e] (port=35660 helo=guerry) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.2:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA256:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1kclHP-0004IC-PZ; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 03:15:00 -0500 Received: by guerry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 1ED041A60E8F; Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:14:57 +0100 (CET) From: Bastien To: Kyle Meyer Subject: Re: Inconsistency between code and manual: org-lowest-priority or org-priority-lowest Organization: GNU References: <87blgktior.fsf@kyleam.com> <87v9eq7169.fsf@kyleam.com> Date: Wed, 11 Nov 2020 09:14:57 +0100 In-Reply-To: <87v9eq7169.fsf@kyleam.com> (Kyle Meyer's message of "Sat, 31 Oct 2020 13:30:54 -0400") Message-ID: <87lff8cnsu.fsf@gnu.org> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Org Mode List , Daniele Nicolodi Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Emacs-orgmode" X-Scanner: ns3122888.ip-94-23-21.eu Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gnu.org; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=emacs-orgmode-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.51 X-TUID: OkLJujk88gsU Hi Kyle, Kyle Meyer writes: > Daniele Nicolodi writes: > >> On 30/10/2020 05:57, Kyle Meyer wrote: > >>> The org-X-priority -> org-priority-X rename happened in v9.4, with >>> org-X-priority names retained as aliases. So, it sounds like there are >>> some leftover bits in the code. >> >> You are absolutely right. This is what you get when you read the manual >> for the latest version but look at the code for an old one... > > Quickly grepping, a few instances of the old names remain in the code > base, if you're still interested in sending a patch. I fixed the ones I've found in 370cf49cd and ff5fd323b. Thanks! -- Bastien