From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id WKp+KTZYBWYmsAAAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 12:44:54 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e16b::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id WKp+KTZYBWYmsAAAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 12:44:54 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=mn01H0Yj; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1711626294; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=ZAbxAkOr0kIsBxXE1LE537ncEV7g4aBCs7Uc8lMphHY=; b=r/YqMd61axLdLVUpmm9IBl/T7ehWUbJAZfbnv2mprmeeeggVLbh8tLN18DihJCaLstjfy4 /5cQ/sKvvgfz7blNWOIjRQQggk71cy/2w9wd5DRY3doj+JfhgoMgZTOxA3exH2zjJGhb2Z 90vF9zhk2p04FmgTg3GPV7KFKR/X5sK6AwjUOrrmCZxgZYDM4SVQ9R7jjXdsj87PClyLWD Cr450FBz6UvJd+iqJP9lLhspbc/hLnIMNElBo/p4PaG6i/eolcQ67j0K18xLlZ4ggL6tT1 DqbNPNg3eJpqMJQIJV56Ob/0987QcFep5Nb7Pkwe6sxwwppUavz7GiVHj+eLEg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=posteo.net header.s=2017 header.b=mn01H0Yj; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=posteo.net ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1711626294; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=gU8sjlD1E+PDl2oqIMgnewe3Xk2qC2PtK2unOQANyTYGrU66AotgI5mUFxUgo+tYP5Yj5A 2CnsX/XJgkspJGeL4UwvnmH5byS9qVtrZCS/plyEdE71ELbLPXwHGhOQl+3y+tzKPmwkyl RoeNY2ZzvH8lEh77N6gP4fM5zRr89JUsHfpy1HIDQohA4qT6d8UgmBu6YsoQ7of1d0S8w7 ymG7CNnlWl9Km7HbAHvO4kBz9MxoPAlWVOfYytqQl5UpXzoowFyYsphl8/dYtTgajl8Uss KqnD70JrJ4PnbMkPeh9xf5I6hHRuPODNddDUkL6rzciDFRyMtGj1GMdqrJ5Low== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5AD6910575 for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 12:44:54 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rpoAv-0000ew-Jt; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 07:44:05 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rpoAt-0000eh-Ae for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 07:44:03 -0400 Received: from mout01.posteo.de ([185.67.36.65]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rpoAp-0002eg-MR for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 07:44:02 -0400 Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout01.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1C36024002A for ; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 12:43:57 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1711626237; bh=BrWK+WLGC9tpN258SbUmmLndgyG33xp0ZE3JZAY0ucg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: From; b=mn01H0Yjdx9Gybs/PziZfVvg5XI4g/6WReQibhREb1dt8uZdCcMkAaQuylXYsfECG PapaXNYS/84vqv15f+bL+oTpn9zBl+m7LK0z5plg3kIGQ0OHE8sg31wP2OgmcOYujm S7MuYwKwjon+qZZCeUL6jb6jJThxa3Rn+a6YRTyySnuaNkEp9sOs1b8FJfKL+TVZLK Yo18U30WFKMk2Wt7duylWSya80vOSS3PGgapWGAb9UjKlXuMf3XqxdWQTzSZsQGOF3 SELIBI/o/mioS//su68qzWgc8QdLjUGIBBKvI1dcQKlRMV5qLEc7tdiKZhl4rhpnAI ZcMBaud+7JRGw== Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4V51s82Q4Rz9rxD; Thu, 28 Mar 2024 12:43:55 +0100 (CET) From: Ihor Radchenko To: Adam Porter Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Subject: Re: [Worg] CSS improvements In-Reply-To: <38e2ca8a-175b-4f74-aae5-39f6d605a6b8@alphapapa.net> References: <57934e1d-37eb-4b75-b8ed-6666dcc3848e@alphapapa.net> <87le6957ha.fsf@localhost> <14b3b7df-baeb-45b5-a530-aa11ccf09d0c@alphapapa.net> <87plvkf1p0.fsf@localhost> <00a7258c-d3ef-4a22-ae08-35c62d71cc27@alphapapa.net> <87le659hgv.fsf@localhost> <38e2ca8a-175b-4f74-aae5-39f6d605a6b8@alphapapa.net> Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2024 11:44:03 +0000 Message-ID: <87le62twcc.fsf@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.65; envelope-from=yantar92@posteo.net; helo=mout01.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -43 X-Spam_score: -4.4 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Spam-Score: -6.55 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 5AD6910575 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx13.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -6.55 X-TUID: stk1Z4ia+xE4 Adam Porter writes: > ... > So I would still suggest that, on Worg, we use my suggested styling on > #+begin_center blocks. This would make them useful and fulfill their > natural purpose. I think that we have a principal disagreement here. For me, highlighting #+begin_center blocks is extremely unnatural. I would never expect that, and I would be extremely surprised by that. I guess we can make this into a poll... (I have no better ideas on how to resolve the disagreement) > Since Worg is updated with relatively low frequency, anyway, perhaps > this suggestion could be tried as an experiment. If problems are found > with it, then the extra styling, beyond merely centering the text, could > be reverted. Nothing is permanent here; we've probably spilled more > virtual ink on this topic than would be affected by the change. I am mostly worried about future effect. We will not have any problems with it in the near future, because the only user of this style will be your new WORG page. > Anyway, if this idea is vetoed, it would still be good to have some way > to make text stand out in a standard way, similar to various HTML > documentation styles in other projects (to avoid resorting to inline > HTML). It seems like a missing feature on Worg. Agree. > And the other changes in the patch would be good to have, regardless. Yup. -- Ihor Radchenko // yantar92, Org mode contributor, Learn more about Org mode at . Support Org development at , or support my work at