From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Matt Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org>
Subject: Re: urgency & importance (was: (no subject)
Date: Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:40:18 -0400
Message-ID: <87k4zw1fl9.fsf@fastmail.fm>
References: <m3fxake8hs.wl%greenrd@greenrd.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MoedP-0000JR-4N
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:40:27 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43)
	id 1MoedK-0000B0-Ch
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:40:26 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48980 helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1MoedJ-0000A4-RV
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:40:21 -0400
Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.25]:40522)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <lundin@fastmail.fm>) id 1MoedJ-0005Tm-8n
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Fri, 18 Sep 2009 10:40:21 -0400
In-Reply-To: <m3fxake8hs.wl%greenrd@greenrd.org> (Robin Green's message of
	"Fri, 18 Sep 2009 13:35:11 +0100")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Robin Green <greenrd@greenrd.org>
Cc: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org

Robin Green <greenrd@greenrd.org> writes:

> Is there any equivalent to planner-mode's planner-rank.el for
> org-mode? I want to automatically compute some sort of combined
> measure of urgency and importance for each of my TODOs, and rank them
> according to this measure. (Of course, I could write my own code to do
> this, and I might do just that if there isn't anything suitable
> already out there.)

Could you please explain what you mean by urgency and importance? I'm
not familiar with that distinction.

You might want to checkout the docstring for the variable
org-agenda-sorting-strategy. There are lots of ways to sort items in the
agenda, along with the possibility of creating your own sorting
functions.

Best,
Matt