From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Jason Dunsmore <emacs-orgmode@dunsmor.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Worg needs some reorganizing
Date: Tue, 18 Jan 2011 13:15:51 -0600
Message-ID: <87k4i2gh08.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com>
References: <4CAD81B0.6090807@manor-farm.org> <87ocayl81d.fsf@manor-farm.org>
	<0E084C6C-6FD1-4C74-BD9F-34F2830B93C5@gmail.com>
	<87bp6ytacd.fsf_-_@stats.ox.ac.uk> <87fwsubckf.fsf@gnu.org>
	<87aaj2w5x4.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87d3nyuhkw.fsf@altern.org>
	<AANLkTikmwyPCG=QV==RaaCuejOPKw6hSdoy7Rf1RxfDU@mail.gmail.com>
	<87aaj0kggo.fsf@gmail.com> <87zkr0load.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com>
	<87pqrwipjd.fsf@gmail.com> <87oc7glhef.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com>
	<87hbd8ins8.fsf@gmail.com> <87ipxolgji.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com>
	<87aaj0iiff.fsf@gmail.com> <87r5cbk28p.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com>
	<87fwsrtokh.fsf@gnu.org> <87fwsrjtnx.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com>
	<87hbd7jr42.fsf@gmail.com> <87k4i2fa7l.fsf@gmail.com>
	<87vd1mgnip.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Return-path: <emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=44519 helo=eggs.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PfH22-0007EY-TK
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:15:55 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-orgmode@dunsmor.com>) id 1PfH21-0002qF-TW
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:15:54 -0500
Received: from deathroller.dunsmor.com ([98.129.169.48]:42348)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <emacs-orgmode@dunsmor.com>) id 1PfH21-0002q8-QJ
	for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Tue, 18 Jan 2011 14:15:53 -0500
In-Reply-To: <87vd1mgnip.fsf@riotblast.dunsmor.com> (Jason Dunsmore's message
	of "Tue, 18 Jan 2011 10:55:10 -0600")
List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." <emacs-orgmode.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-orgmode@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode>,
	<mailto:emacs-orgmode-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Jason Dunsmore <emacs-orgmode@dunsmor.com>
Cc: Dan Davison <davison@stats.ox.ac.uk>, Ian Barton <ian@manor-farm.org>, Bastien <bastien.guerry@wikimedia.fr>, Matt Lundin <mdl@imapmail.org>, emacs-orgmode@gnu.org, Carsten Dominik <carsten.dominik@gmail.com>

Jason Dunsmore <emacs-orgmode@dunsmor.com> writes:

> "Eric Schulte" <schulte.eric@gmail.com> writes:
>
>>>>
>>>> By the way, having the javascript section-folding enabled on only some
>>>> pages is confusing and doesn't make for the best browsing experience.
>>>> Now that the TOC will be collapsed by default, perhaps it's no longer
>>>> needed?
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes the javascript is probably the culprit here, I agree that with the
>>> hidden TOC it is probably not required.  My preference would be to
>>> remove the section folding (and use of javascript) from Worg entirely.
>>>
>>
>> Is there a consensus on removing Javascript folding from *all* pages on
>> Worg.  I think this would be an improvement both for the readability and
>> stylistic coherence of the site.
>
> I am in favor of removing the javascript folding from all Worg pages.
> It would improve the consistency and experience of browsing Worg.

I made a version of the FAQ without the javascript folding:

http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg/org-faq-nojs.html
http://orgmode.org/tmp/worg/org-faq.html

It like it better, but it's still a bit unwieldy.  Maybe the FAQ just
needs to be reorganized.  See how Wikipedia does it:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FAQ
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:FAQ_Index

Matt or Bastien, do you have an opinion on reorganizing the FAQ?