From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Bastien Subject: Re: Regression in `org-todo' Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 17:03:04 +0200 Message-ID: <87k41yxjkn.fsf@altern.org> References: <20120402145403.GB1704@mischka.fritz.box> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:36445) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SEilX-0004Eg-5p for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 11:02:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SEilU-0001TY-M9 for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 11:01:54 -0400 Received: from mail-wi0-f177.google.com ([209.85.212.177]:49568) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1SEilU-0001TD-CA for emacs-orgmode@gnu.org; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 11:01:52 -0400 Received: by wibhj13 with SMTP id hj13so2172298wib.12 for ; Mon, 02 Apr 2012 08:01:50 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120402145403.GB1704@mischka.fritz.box> (Michael Strey's message of "Mon, 2 Apr 2012 16:54:04 +0200") List-Id: "General discussions about Org-mode." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: emacs-orgmode-bounces+geo-emacs-orgmode=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: emacs-orgmode@gnu.org Hi Michael, Michael Strey writes: > This bug fix seems not to be complete. At least switching the todo > state in repeated tasks and in conjunction with org-checklist didn't > work for me as it used to before the last update. PFA a patch that > solved the problem for me. Thanks for reporting this -- this has already been solved in this commit: http://orgmode.org/w/?p=org-mode.git;a=commit;h=9d01ca1bf357917de0c496e86405e24c65b5761c > ATTENTION: Please check this patch very carefully. This is my first > contribution to org-mode and my first patch ever. My lisp knowledge is > rudimentary and I do not really understand the code. The rest of the patch isn't relevant as it changes a symbol's name (s/state/org-state) for which we don't need the value. Please test against latest HEAD and tell me if your problem is still here, it shouldn't. Thanks! -- Bastien